ST. LOUIS — An appeals court has upheld a $3.2 million settlement in litigation that accused Edward Jones' 401(k) plan of picking investment funds based on whether it had a relationship with the funds' providers.
The 2016 class-action suit said Edward Jones forced the plan to charge excessive fees that benefited the company's mutual fund partners, plus charged excessive administrative fees. The company denied wrongdoing.
A settlement was reached in 2018, but an objector, Shiyang Huang, in 2019 said it shouldn't have been approved because the employees lacked standing. He said the deal improperly covered former plan participants and gave named plaintiffs $10,000 incentive awards they didn't deserve.
But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Jan. 31 said the plaintiffs had standing to bring the class action and that a district court did not abuse its discretion in granting awards.
Edward Jones is one of the St. Louis region's largest employers, with about 6,500 local employees included in its roughly 44,500 companywide workforce, and one of its largest securities broker-dealers, according to Business Journal research.
The privately held company reported full-year 2019 net revenue of nearly $9.4 billion, up 11% from $8.5 billion in 2018. Net income before allocations to the partners, who own the firm, totaled nearly $1.1 billion last year, 10% more than the $990 million in 2018. The firm reported it ended 2019 with 18,704 financial advisers, a 6% increase from 17,615 a year earlier. Client assets under management at year end totaled nearly $1.35 trillion, up 22% from the end of 2018.
Click here for more from the St. Louis Business Journal.
More Local News
- ‘At the end of the day, we’re all one big hockey family’ | Knights tribute to Blues’ Bouwmeester
- 'Power Lunch' | Lindbergh High School blocks bullying with longer lunch
- Dog who stayed by homeless owner’s body in cold is 'living the life' after STL police officer rescues her
- Anna, the cat that survived being 'Frozen', is ready for adoption
- ‘A very, very scary thought’ | Could looking at your past with an at-home DNA test cost you in the future?