x
Breaking News
More () »

Local lawmakers react to Electoral College certification

A few lawmakers across Missouri and Illinois have issued statements in response to the certification

WASHINGTON — Congress confirmed Joe Biden as the presidential election winner early Thursday after a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol.

Pro-Trump supporters gathered outside the Capitol Wednesday afternoon to protest a peaceful transfer of power. The protest turned into a riot when people stormed into the building, which caused it to go on lockdown.

Following the riot, Congress got back to work Wednesday night and the Electoral College vote was certified just after 2:30 Thursday morning. The final count is 306-232, affirming Biden's election win.

A few lawmakers across Missouri and Illinois have issued statements in response to the certification.

RELATED: Photo shows Hawley giving fist pump to Trump supporters before Capitol violence

Senator Roy Blunt

“President Trump won the votes of millions of Americans. I supported President Trump and served as co-chair of his campaign in Missouri.

“I defended the president’s right to pursue all legal options available to his campaign to ensure every legal vote was counted and every illegal vote was not.

“His lawyers presented the evidence they had to more than 90 judges – many of them Republican-appointed, including several nominated by President Trump – in more than 60 different cases. That process ended with each state certifying its election results in accordance with the Constitution and state law.

“There are two reasons Congress can object to any state’s electors: that the vote was not regularly given or that the elector was not lawfully certified according to state law. None of today’s statements contained new information that has not already been presented to, and reviewed by, a state or federal court. My view is that there is not sufficient evidence to sustain the objections. The states and the voters in each state elect the president. As such, Congress has a constitutional obligation to accept the election results.

“Today’s outrageous attack on the Capitol was a sad day for America. But we will move forward and we will continue living up to the example of democracy we have long set for the world.”

Senator Tammy Duckworth

“What happened in the Capitol yesterday was a painful reminder that democracy is fragile and it’s up to every one of us—elected officials and citizens alike—to work to keep it. It’s time we get back to the work of creating a more perfect Union, spend less time fighting each other and more time fighting this deadly pandemic. Thankfully, in just 13 days, Joe Biden will be sworn in as President of the United States and Donald Trump will leave the White House in shame.”

RELATED: St. Louis area lawmakers react as Trump supporters storm US Capitol

Representative Mike Bost

“As a United States representative, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, no matter how difficult or divisive the issue at hand. And when it comes to certifying a state’s electoral votes, the Constitution is clear: state legislatures set the rules for states in conducting their elections. However, that simply was not the case in certain states in 2020. 

“Two states in particular, Pennsylvania and Arizona, faced objections in the House and Senate to their electoral vote allocations, prompting floor votes in both chambers. I voted to object to the electoral votes of both states because, in my belief, they failed to meet that constitutional standard. The deeply troubling scenes at the U.S. Capitol yesterday indicate the intense distrust that many Americans have towards the election process. If we have any hope of restoring that faith and healing the deep divisions in our country, our efforts must be rooted in constitutional principles and fair elections.”

Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer

"In my June 26th Bulletin, I wrote that our law enforcement officers 'commit to a life where their own personal safety comes second to everyone around them. They put their lives on the line every single day and run directly into harm’s way when the rest of us are trying to get out of it.' I also wrote of the 'chaos and danger created by lawlessness and mob rule.' Sadly, only seven months later we once again saw police officers and government institutions being attacked by opportunists dead set on creating chaos. The men and women of the United States Capitol Police, Washington, D.C. Police, the National Guard, and several other surrounding police departments put their lives on the line to protect one of the symbols of our democracy. There is no excuse for the violence that took place on Wednesday, and we are forever indebted to our law enforcement officers for their protection and service.

Wednesday morning, before the House and Senate met for the joint session to count electors, I released a statement with several of my colleagues discussing the constitutionality of certain states altering their election processes. The Constitution clearly states that only the state legislatures are given the authority to direct the manner of appointing presidential electors. By circumventing their state legislatures and unilaterally changing voting laws, multiple state governments violated the plain language of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. Changing election laws in an unconstitutional manner mean the slates of electors produced under those modified laws are thus unconstitutional, not "regularly given" or "lawfully certified" as required by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. Election laws are in place to ensure the integrity of our elections and must be followed. Because of that fact I felt dutybound to object.

Objecting was a difficult decision and certainly one I do not take lightly. Ultimately, the Constitution, U.S. law, and historic precedent were the basis of my decision. It was made not to allow Congress to pick the President – that is in no way Congress’ duty or right – but to ensure the American People did.

Throughout my discussions with lawyers and upon my decision to object I – like all Americans – never dreamed that in a few short hours rioters would be scaling the Capitol walls and ransacking the halls of Congress. After hours of chaos, in which at least four people lost their lives, many Members of Congress wanted to delay the count or quickly approve all electors without debate. I certainly don’t blame them for those feelings. However, no amount of intimidation or threat of violence can change the words of the Constitution and what I believe is my duty as the representative of Missouri’s Third District, so I voted in support of the objections on the House floor.

With emotions still high, it is being said that objections are unprecedented or somehow an afront to democracy. That couldn’t be further from the truth. During the elector counting of 2017, House Democrats objected to the electors of nine states. They cited everything from voter suppression to Russian interference to corrupted voting machines. Throughout their arguments I never once accused them of treason, sedition, or any type of crimes against our democracy. In 2005, after President Bush won re-election, Democrats objected to the state of Ohio for what they called 'serious election irregularities.' There are plenty of other examples I could give, but my point is this: it is extremely disingenuous to suggest objecting to electorates is unprecedented. We are all outraged by the riots that occurred Wednesday; we don’t need faux outrage from my colleagues for the objections they themselves have raised.

The attack on the Capitol was a tragic moment for America. Every American at every level should strongly condemn those acts and seek the justice that should be carried out. We must also learn from this moment and find a new way of debating matters of national importance. When Joe Biden is sworn in as our President, I will do everything I can to protect our economic and personal freedom from government overreach. And I will continually push state legislatures and the courts to ensure an election that left doubt in so many American minds never happens again. While some of those conversations will be contentious and tempers may flair, they will be carried out respectfully, without violence, and keeping in mind that we are all Americans."

Before You Leave, Check This Out