SPRINGFIELD, Mo. — A Springfield, Missouri, woman is suing the city over its decision to require face coverings, saying the health of others “is not my responsibility.”
Rachel Shelton is asking the court to temporarily stop an ordinance, and to rule that it violates her rights. The Springfield law follows a big spike in new confirmed cases of the coronavirus in southwestern Missouri and across the state.
“Your health is not my responsibility,” Shelton said at a news conference Thursday, according to the Springfield News-Leader. “Your emotional well-being is not my responsibility.”
Springfield, Missouri's third-largest city, is among several jurisdictions in the state that have begun requiring face coverings in many public places.
Confirmed COVID-19 cases have risen sharply since Republican Gov. Mike Parson allowed the state to reopen for business in mid-June. A new record for a single day was set Tuesday. That record was broken on Wednesday, and that record was topped Thursday when the state health department announced 1,637 new confirmed cases.
The state also has recorded 1,179 deaths since the pandemic began.
The number of infections is thought to be far higher because many people have not been tested, and studies suggest people can be infected with the virus without feeling sick.
Shelton's attorney, Kristi Fulnecky, said Springfield's ordinance violates Shelton’s right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment and freedom of expression and religion under the First Amendment because she “does not want to be required to wear face coverings during church worship” or in businesses.
Fulnecky also said the ordinance that took effect last week is overly broad and violates due process.
The Springfield ordinance requires people older than 11 to wear a face covering at most businesses, entertainment venues, religious services and K-12 schools, with some exceptions.
Across Missouri, schools are deciding whether to hold in-person classes when students return to school. St. Louis County Executive Sam Page, a Democrat, has suggested that parents opt for virtual learning.
"As this trend is going it will be very difficult for schools to have anything other than an all virtual curriculum,” Page said at a news conference Friday.
More Coronavirus Coverage
- St. Louis County reports record number of new COVID-19 cases for 3rd day in a row
- $1 million in grants will help domestic violence victims in St. Louis County
- CDC releases 'Decision-Making Tool' for parents in school reopening guidance
- These St. Louis area restaurants are temporarily closed again due to the coronavirus
- St. Louis area leaders defend decision to restrict youth sports